The DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential document used for the NCO Evaluation Report, specifically designed for Sergeants in the U.S. Army. This form captures vital information regarding an NCO's performance, including their duties, evaluations, and potential for future assignments. Understanding how to accurately complete this form is crucial for both the rated NCO and their evaluators.
Ready to fill out the form? Click the button below to get started!
The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential tool used within the U.S. Army for evaluating the performance of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) at the rank of Sergeant. This evaluation report not only serves to assess an NCO's professional capabilities but also plays a crucial role in their career progression and development. The form is divided into several key sections that include administrative data, authentication by raters, and detailed performance evaluations. Within the administrative section, vital information such as the NCO's name, Social Security Number, rank, and unit details is captured. This ensures that all evaluations are accurately attributed. The authentication part requires signatures from both the rater and senior rater, confirming the authenticity of the evaluation. Performance evaluations encompass various attributes such as character, presence, intellect, leadership, development, and achievement, each assessed against Army standards. Additionally, the senior rater provides an overall potential assessment, comparing the rated NCO to peers, which can significantly influence future assignments and opportunities. Understanding the structure and purpose of the DA Form 2166-9-1 is crucial for both NCOs and their evaluators, as it not only reflects past performance but also shapes future career paths.
Basketball Evaluation Form - Assess the player's ability to transition between offense and defense.
The Ohio Mobile Home Bill of Sale is a legal document used to transfer ownership of a mobile home from one party to another. This form outlines essential details such as the buyer and seller's information, the mobile home's description, and the sale price. To further assist with this process, you can find a comprehensive form at parkhomebillofsale.com/free-ohio-mobile-home-bill-of-sale/. Understanding this document is crucial for ensuring a smooth transaction and protecting both parties' interests.
Acord 130 - The application includes a dedicated section for outlining any required safety protocols in place to mitigate risk.
How to Gift a Car to a Family Member in Louisiana - Each party involved must understand their rights and responsibilities outlined in the act of donation.
Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form is an essential process for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs). This form requires specific information about the NCO, the rater, and the senior rater, as well as performance evaluations and duty descriptions. Following the steps below will help ensure that the form is filled out accurately and completely.
The DA 2166 9 1 form is an NCO Evaluation Report specifically designed for Sergeants. It serves as a tool to assess the performance and potential of non-commissioned officers within the Army. This form captures essential administrative data, duty descriptions, and performance evaluations, helping to ensure that NCOs receive appropriate feedback on their performance and areas for improvement.
The form is primarily filled out by the rater, who is typically the immediate supervisor of the NCO being evaluated. The senior rater also plays a crucial role in the evaluation process, providing an overall assessment of the NCO's potential. It is important that both parties accurately complete their respective sections to ensure a fair evaluation. The rated NCO must also sign the form to acknowledge their understanding of the evaluation, although their signature does not indicate agreement with the assessment.
The form requires several key pieces of information, including:
Accurate completion of these sections is crucial for the evaluation's validity.
If a rated NCO disagrees with their evaluation, they have the right to appeal. The appeal process is outlined in AR 623-3. The NCO must submit a written request detailing the reasons for their disagreement. This request should be directed to the appropriate authority, typically the senior rater or the rater's supervisor. It’s essential to act promptly, as there are specific timeframes for submitting an appeal after the evaluation is received.
Once the DA 2166 9 1 form is submitted, it is generally considered final. However, if there are significant errors or omissions, it may be possible to request an amendment. This request should be made through the chain of command and must include a clear explanation of the necessary changes. It is important to address any discrepancies as soon as possible to maintain the integrity of the evaluation process.
The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an NCO Evaluation Report used in the U.S. Army to assess the performance of non-commissioned officers. A similar document is the DA Form 67-9, which serves as the Officer Evaluation Report. Both forms aim to evaluate personnel based on their performance and potential for future assignments. The DA Form 67-9 includes sections for administrative data, performance assessment, and overall potential, mirroring the structure of the DA Form 2166-9-1. Each form requires signatures from raters and senior raters, ensuring accountability and accuracy in the evaluation process.
Another comparable document is the DA Form 705, which is used for recording the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, the DA Form 705 includes personal information, performance metrics, and a section for comments. Both forms emphasize the importance of physical fitness as a component of overall performance. The APFT results on the DA Form 705 can directly influence evaluations on the DA Form 2166-9-1, highlighting the interconnectedness of physical readiness and professional development.
The DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form, is also similar in purpose. It provides a structured format for leaders to counsel soldiers on their performance and professional growth. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 focuses on formal evaluations, the DA Form 4856 allows for ongoing feedback and development discussions. Both documents require signatures from the leader and the soldier, reinforcing the collaborative nature of performance assessments in the military.
Another related document is the DA Form 7500, which is the Enlisted Record Brief. This form provides a comprehensive overview of a soldier's career, including assignments, training, and evaluations. While the DA Form 2166-9-1 specifically assesses performance over a set period, the DA Form 7500 serves as a cumulative record. Both documents are essential for promotion considerations and career progression, reflecting the soldier's overall qualifications and readiness for advancement.
The DA Form 2-1, or Personnel Qualification Record, is also noteworthy. This form captures an individual's military history, including assignments and training. Similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, it is used by leaders to evaluate a soldier's qualifications for various positions. Both documents are integral to personnel management within the Army, providing essential data for decision-making regarding promotions and assignments.
Additionally, the DA Form 4187, which is used for personnel actions, shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1 in that it requires specific information about a soldier's status and performance. The DA Form 4187 is often used to request changes in a soldier's duty status, while the DA Form 2166-9-1 assesses their performance in that status. Both forms necessitate thorough documentation and verification by leadership, ensuring a clear record of personnel management actions.
The DA Form 2823, or Sworn Statement, is another document that can be compared to the DA Form 2166-9-1. While primarily used for documenting witness accounts or statements during investigations, it also emphasizes the importance of accuracy and accountability in reporting. Both forms require detailed information and can influence personnel evaluations or decisions, underscoring the significance of integrity in military assessments.
The DA Form 7574, which is the Army's Award Recommendation Form, is also relevant. This document is used to recommend soldiers for awards based on their performance and contributions. Similar to the DA Form 2166-9-1, it requires detailed descriptions of the individual's achievements and impact. Both forms serve to recognize and document the accomplishments of soldiers, contributing to their professional reputation and career advancement.
The DA Form 638, used for recommending awards, aligns closely with the DA Form 2166-9-1 in that it assesses performance and contributions to the unit. Both forms require specific information about the soldier's achievements and their relevance to military objectives. The DA Form 638 provides a formal mechanism for acknowledging exceptional service, similar to how the DA Form 2166-9-1 evaluates overall performance and potential.
Understanding the various forms that facilitate military evaluations is essential for ensuring thorough assessments and constructive feedback. Just as the Illinois First Report 45 form is crucial for reporting work-related injuries or illnesses, military forms like the DA Form 2166-9-1 play a significant role in documenting performance and supporting the personal development of soldiers. For more specific guidance on necessary documentation in Illinois, one could refer to the Illinois Templates PDF.
Lastly, the DA Form 1059, which is the Academic Evaluation Report, is similar in that it evaluates a soldier's performance in a training environment. Both forms assess the individual's abilities, strengths, and areas for improvement. The DA Form 1059 focuses on academic achievements, while the DA Form 2166-9-1 encompasses broader performance metrics, but both are critical for shaping a soldier's career trajectory within the Army.
Understanding the DA 2166 9 1 form is essential for both NCOs and their evaluators. However, several misconceptions can lead to confusion. Here are nine common misconceptions about this form:
This form is used for both positive and negative evaluations. It reflects the NCO's overall performance and potential, not just shortcomings.
Signing the form does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the evaluation. It simply confirms that the NCO has seen the report and that the administrative data is correct.
While performance is a significant factor, evaluations also consider leadership qualities, professionalism, and the NCO's ability to develop others.
The senior rater's assessment is equally important. Their insights provide a broader perspective on the NCO's potential.
The information contained in the DA 2166 9 1 form is sensitive. It is protected under the Privacy Act, and unauthorized disclosure is prohibited.
A supplementary review is required for certain evaluations, ensuring an additional layer of oversight and accountability.
The evaluation period must be clearly defined and adhered to. It should accurately reflect the time frame of the NCO's performance.
Height and weight are crucial components of the evaluation. They reflect the NCO's adherence to Army standards and overall fitness.
There is an established appeals process for NCO evaluations. NCOs should be aware of their rights to contest an evaluation if they believe it is unjust.
When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, attention to detail is critical. Here are four essential do's and don'ts to keep in mind:
Filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form can be a straightforward process, but many individuals make common mistakes that can lead to complications. One frequent error is failing to provide complete and accurate information in the Administrative Data section. For instance, omitting the last name or the middle initial can cause delays in processing. Each piece of information is crucial, so double-checking this section is essential before submission.
Another mistake occurs with the Social Security Number or DOD ID number. Some individuals mistakenly enter an incorrect number or skip this field entirely. This error can create significant issues, as the form relies on this identification to associate the evaluation with the right individual. Always ensure that the number is accurate and formatted correctly.
Many people also overlook the importance of the Rater's Signature and the associated date. Failing to sign the form or not dating it can invalidate the evaluation. The signature confirms that the rater has reviewed the content, so it is critical to remember this step. A missing signature can lead to unnecessary complications and delays.
In the Performance Evaluation section, some individuals provide vague comments instead of specific, actionable feedback. Each area, such as Character and Presence, requires detailed observations that reflect the rated NCO's performance. Generic statements do not provide a clear picture and can hinder the evaluation's effectiveness.
Another common oversight is neglecting the Counseling Dates. Failing to fill in these dates can suggest that the rated NCO did not receive adequate feedback throughout the evaluation period. Proper documentation of counseling sessions is vital for transparency and accountability.
Some users also forget to include the Rated NCO's Email Address. This detail is necessary for communication and may be required for further administrative processes. Leaving this field blank can lead to confusion and hinder timely correspondence.
Additionally, individuals sometimes misinterpret the Overall Potential section. Selecting an inappropriate category, such as “Not Qualified” for someone who is performing well, can severely impact the rated NCO’s career. It is crucial to reflect accurately on the individual's potential in comparison to peers.
In the Duty Description section, failing to provide a comprehensive overview of daily duties can lead to misunderstandings about the rated NCO's responsibilities. It is important to clearly outline the scope of duties to ensure an accurate evaluation of performance.
Lastly, some may neglect to review the entire form for spelling and grammatical errors. These mistakes can detract from the professionalism of the report and may lead to misinterpretation. Taking the time to proofread can help present a clear and polished document.